Conservation vs Social Welfare, Which one has the priority to be supported by the Korean Government?Governmental limited budeget should be spent on Unesco World Heritage conservation rather than provide the food, shelter, and jobs for the homeless.
I think conservation is more urgent then social welfare. Humans have been developing at an excessive speed. The world has already lost too much valuble world heritage because of the development. If we don't take action now all the heritages could be lost. Social welfare is an important problem, but not as urgent as the heritages. Social welfare is a long term problem that takes lots of time and effort. But we could conserve lots of the heritages with a little effort. That is why the money should be used to conserve the world heritage.
ok, I read your essay. i think your opinion is very logical and have apparent thoughts. however I am not in favor of your essay, if you want to know my opinion, visit my blog. thank you
답글삭제